[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG


View post   

File: 166 KB, 471x471, 20124_10204343878097271_3273230185357426442_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
489071 No.489071 [Reply] [Original]

Hi.
If this somehow doesn't go with the rules (i've read them, and i think i'm in the clear), feel free to tell me/edit.

I'm searching for a project i saw somewhere on the web a while back.
It's a headsculpt, refined from a 3D scan.
The head is male. I'm not sure, but it could be a self-portrait or a portrait of a friend of the artist.

Age of model is around 20-30.

The textures are scanned from the models face.

The thread contains very detailed instructions of all steps.

The ONE thing i strongly remember is the way he presented the portrait in the thread.
There was a huge GIF, alternating between a black and white and full color version of the portrait.

It's probably the most realistic portrait i've seen, but i can't find it.

I'd appreciate any help i can get, thanks in advance.

(pic not related, new PC with no content on it)

>> No.489083

>>489071
>>/r/

>> No.489085

>>489083
/r redirected me here, should've mentioned that.

>> No.489310

>>489071
Do you remember which 3d package he used? The pipeline or plugins he used?

>> No.489535

>>489310
unfortunately not, no.
i can't even remember which damn forum it was posted on!
uuugh, it makes me feel so angry when i can't find any lead at all...

i somehow want to remember that he used a popular hair plugin for 3ds max, maybe Ornatrix?

i DO remember that he had a whole section dedicated to how he modeled and rendered the eyes, they were incredibly realistic.

the model was smiling, mouth a bit opened, semi to long hair, blonde or lighter haircolor.

oh, and just as for the eyes, he had a huge section dedicated towards the gum and how he textured the gum and teeth!

sorry for not being able to offer much to go on.

>> No.492148


testing if code tags work

>> No.492150

>>492148
>testing if code tags work
[fuck]you[/fuck]

>> No.492163

>>492148
>>492150

wasn't me (OP), but it got bumped so i won't complain.