/3/ - 3DCG

>>972708

>>972708

Hahaha! Wow, you raged REAL hard. I can tell you never actually did anything you just described, because as someone who did I can assure you: you are fucking retarded. Just...horribly brain damaged. The crap we were making in the 90s was exactly that: crap.

Why do you think nobody does any of that anymore? Because it looks like shit. It looked like shit in 1994, too, but we didn't have any options back then. It was the best shit we could make. The only teams that could make anything look even remotely not like shit were working for the big guys like ILM or Digital Domain.

Go enjoy your "sovl", you monumental turd.

>>959300

They're not controversial, they're just garbage, and the people who like them are idiots with awful taste. They'll pop up frequently, asking the most inane questions, and talking about how old graphics had so much "soul", but the reality is they're FUCKING IDIOTS.

Aw, look at all the little autistic faggots in here bitching about a cartoon being cartoonish. Maybe go model another Desert Eagle and fap to some pegging porn to cheer yourselves up?

>>914075

>Nobody would pay more than $50

And the seller would be selling it more than one time. If I sculpted your model and listed it somewhere for $50, I would be hoping to sell it more than once and make at least a few thousand off it. If you want a $50 model, go there.

But you want a custom model designed to your specs, specifically for your use. That means I'm selling it once. Alright, then you have to cover the amount of money I would normally make selling it to a few dozen people.

>Vrchat, there are plenty of people who make these for free

Yes, and Vrchat models are low-detail, low-poly models that are trash for printing. You get what you pay for.

>>895106

Hi new kid. You should leave before the shitty fucksticks that thrive on this board ruin your interest in making 3d coomer stuff. Seriously, everybody in here is a huge asshole, myself included.