/3/ - 3DCG

>>461196
Looking way better man. Although i didn't realise it was meant to be futuristic. When i think high tech/futuristic i think precision/perfection in manufacturing.
For example, the areas i circled in red. The difference in space of those gaps sort of destroys that aesthetic. as do the hard normals. (in green). thinking about the process by which some futuristic tank like this would be built, i'd assume the hulls are made from a mold - and a mold isn't going to have hard angles like those in it along a surface. Also, the little toes on the feet i think are way too thin, and look out of place against all the bulk.

In saying all that, i think this looks a lot better as it is. I imagine it being a big gritty industrial machine covered in paint, scratches and dirt. so all of those human - manufactured faults add to that effect.

The last thing is that it has comparative human scale. I mean you can't tell if this thing is 1 story tall or 10. If you added a long narrow window slit or something on the sides of the head, or some hatches, or some kind of docking/loading bay/panels, that would give it a comparative scale.