[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG

Search:


View post   

>> No.976495 [View]
File: 1.78 MB, 3840x1262, Compare.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
976495

>>976467
Both can be fine, depending on the context. If it's a model that doesn't move, and you're not looking to subsurf (or having a continuous subsurf), then having the flat faces is fine. If you're looking for a continuous mesh, then trying to make things flow cleanly will help later on if you decide to subsurf or bevel.
Hopefully the pic helps out a bit to show the differences and similarities of the approaches (assuming the object on the left of your image is 2 non-continuous meshes stacked). The biggest difference is how the models interact at the junction point. The continuous mesh provides a smooth transition, while the separated one does not. This can be preferable depending on your use case.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]